Web
FTV Cash




GO
Add your email to get our monthly newsletter with all new tips & tricks to help you make more money!
Visa: Changing the Face of an Industry
Almost every Webmaster in our industry has felt the prick from a little thorn in their side that goes by the name of Visa. Over the past nine months, Visa has decided to play hardball with adult webmasters by throwing all sorts of rules, regulations, and fees at them. It was not enough that just Visa was bombarding webmasters, so other companies decided to join in the lynching. Both PayPal and MasterCard have proceeded to place restrictions on the online adult world, with PayPal going as far as declaring that it would no longer accept payment transactions for adult material. So, while Visa has enjoyed being a huge pain in the ass for this industry, it has also inspired other companies to follow suit and become pains as well.

Visa knows they run the show and that they can pretty much set any guidelines they want and webmasters will have to follow or risk losing valuable revenue. Their latest regulation, which has become a huge topic of debate for webmasters, is that adult websites cannot have a chargeback ratio greater than 1%, a large drop from the ratio up until now of 2.5%. Webmasters have only until October 1st to ensure that they are in compliance with this 1% rule or they can say good-bye to using Visa. 

This means that many companies in this industry will have to scramble to restructure their programs, sites, and payouts in order to reduce their chargeback ratio, while at the same time maintaining a level of profitability. Companies are already beginning to take the necessary steps to ensure that they are in compliance. The first step is examining the reasons that make people charge back their site memberships. Then they need to address these reasons, if possible, and try to alleviate the causes of chargebacks. 

Already, we have heard from a number of major sponsors that feel membership price is a main reason that people charge back, and so they feel that by lowering this price, they will in turn reduce chargebacks. However, by lowering membership rates, many companies will lose a significant amount of revenue. In addition to lowering prices, they claim that they must also lower payouts to affiliate webmasters to offset their losses. SilverCash was one of the first programs to announce that they would be lowering their monthly membership fee from $39.28 to $29.28, but that they would also be lowering their payouts to webmasters. After their announcement, many other large programs came forth to say that they would also be lowering their membership fees as well as their payouts.

There has also been much speculation that if free trials were cut out, then chargebacks would decrease, with the notion that free trials are misleading for the surfer. This theory was put into practice when some of the larger programs announced that in conjunction with lowering membership fees and payouts to webmasters, they would also eliminate their free trials. Adult Revenue Service (ARS) turned their free trials into $1.00 trials and also restructured their membership fees in order to be in compliance with the new Visa regulations. 

So, how do webmasters feel about these changes? I would say that there is definitely a 50/50 split in opinions, where half think these changes have been needed for a long time, and the other half feel that there are other ways that companies can reduce chargebacks without having to resort to cutting membership rates and affiliate payouts or eliminating free trials. I usually do not like to sit on the fence in these kinds of arguments, because I typically have very strong opinions, but I really can understand both sides.

The sponsors need to take responsible steps to reduce their chargeback ratios and I do agree that lowering fees and taking away free trials is a step in the right direction. However, I also feel that there are other reasons for chargebacks that these sponsors need to address as well. Many surfers charge back their memberships because they pay for what they think is going to be an amazing site jam-packed with loads of video and picture porn content. They end up getting inside the site and feel mislead when the quality or quantity isnt what they expected, or seemingly promised on the sites tour. I feel that if sponsors re-examined their sites and upgraded their content, that they could reduce their chargeback ratios even more.

This has most definitely been a year of changes for the online adult industry and I feel that when its all said and done, it will have been for the best. By becoming more responsible in our business practices, our industry as a whole will gain further acceptance and credibility.

Post Your Comments
Name:
Rating:
For verification, please enter the characters you see in the image:
Image Verification
Comment:
100 Letters Max
 
WARNING: Any comments you post are solely your responsibility. Webmastervault.com accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with or arising from such content. Defamatory, derogatory, or other comments that we feel should be removed will, at our own discretion and ours alone.
Revenge Bucks


Article Details
Author: Muffy
Date Posted: May 6th, 2004
Topic: Adult Billing Solutions
Reader Rating: 0.0 / 5
Comments Posted: 0 (see below)
 

Browse Our Articles By Topic
Adult Billing Solutions
Adult Content Providers
Adult Industry Events
Adult Industry Lawyers
Adult Industry News
Adult Modeling Agencies
Adult Search Engines
Adult Traffic Brokers
Adult Web Hosting
Adult Web Site Design
Adult Webmaster Forums
Link Lists & Top Sites
Other Resource Sites
Paysite Review Sites
Revenue Programs
Scripts & Software
Thumbnail Gallery Posts


About WebmasterVault   |   rss RSS Feeds   |   Submit A Listing   |   Link To Us   |   Advertising   |   Contact Us


© 2000 - 2008 WebmasterVault.com | All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of our content in whole or in part without expressed written permission is prohibited. Please consult our privacy policy & terms for further information.